Directly present in reviewed material
Example: a message requests a cryptocurrency transfer.
Method · synthetic V0
A useful assessment says what happened, where each claim came from, how strong the support is, what remains unknown, and which action is safe to take before certainty arrives.
Epistemic types
The label follows the claim through review, correction, and publication.
Example: a message requests a cryptocurrency transfer.
Example: an official warning describes the same payment mechanism.
Example: the sequence is highly consistent with impersonation fraud.
Example: the caller controls the account or infrastructure shown.
Five analysis lanes
Evidence strength
Lifecycle
Public records require a review date, responsible reviewer, current state, and correction history. Stale or disproven material is not quietly left to rot.
Privacy boundary
Help cannot be conditional on research consent. There is no automatic pipeline.
Minimum evidence for one person’s assistance. Short retention. No publication or training.
Stages, tactics, evidence states, intervention, and outcome—only if safely consented and minimized.
Methodology, aggregate findings, synthetic examples, reviewed playbooks, and corrections.
V0 boundaries
No real submissions
No public identifiers
No named suspect profiles
No automated final verdict
No continuous collection
No recovery or tracing
No suspect engagement
No “safe” certification